Eating Disorders – A Product of Modern Society

www.mypicshares.com

Has anyone ever asked you whether you have an eating disorder? These days, everyone seems to know someone with one, but eating disorders are much more common than people think. In the 1980s we saw an enormous surge of teenage girls described as having bulimia (binging and purging) and anorexia nervosa (starving oneself to death) in order to keep from being overweight. These were extreme examples of eating disorders.  But there are other eating disorders which may masquerade themselves very sneakily – so difficult to detect in fact, that you may not even realize you or someone else you know has it. The whole way our culture has evolved to regard and consume food can indeed be categorized as one enormous eating disorder. Why is this true?

On the go, no time to eat

Consider the way people live life in modern society – we are constantly taxed and on the go, doing more things each day than is humanely possible to accomplish. Our jobs are demanding and provide little opportunity for breaks, vacations, or rest.  Because we are so busy, that leaves little time for much of anything – especially preparing a nutritious, home-cooked meal.

Unless we pay attention to what we buy and are mindful of ingredients, even those of us who do prepare “home-cooked” meals can easily end up preparing food that is virtually devoid if nutrients. What we wind up eating, most of the time, falls into the category of convenience foods – foods that you don’t prepare from scratch and which come out of a package, can, or box.  And these foods are not natural nor nutritious.

So what’s the result? Fatigue, weakened immune systems, shot adrenal glands, and susceptibility to health issues and disease. That describes our society very well. It goes without saying that when people become tired, they look for something quick and easy to eat – and that’s seldom a home-prepared meal with healthy and organic ingredients from scratch.

What many people reach for are “quick” foods like food bars, crackers, pretzels, cookies, muffins, processed bread with peanut butter (containing hydrogenated oils), shakes and smoothies with little to no real nutrition or protein (and loaded with artificially-produced carbs), conventional dried fruits (treated with sulfur), popsicles, fruit roll-ups or fruit “snacks”, and many other similar items. These foods are highly processed, devoid of nutrients, and if eaten regularly, will cause weight gain, irregular blood sugar (which can lead to diabetes), a disturbance in metabolic processes, and many other issues.

How have things changed since the last 160 years? Prior to industrialized society (mid 1800s), people generally ate foods off the land. They hunted, gathered, and prepared foods from their own homes and cooked from scratch. Literally everything people ate was from their own regions and made from real foods. There were no supermarkets, fast food restaurants, or processed, packaged foods. There were very little toxins, chemicals, or preservatives applied to foods. You either ate the food now, or it spoiled soon after. People who lived back then had relatively little incidence of heart disease. It wasn’t until the 1920s that heart disease began to surface as noticeable problem. Right about that time, processed vegetable oils and refined carbohydrates became more prevalent on the American market.

We count on the fact that many of the foods we purchase can sit on the shelf for months or years and we are able to consume it a long time after purchase. But here’s the important question we should all be asking: is this practice a good idea, and is it healthy? This question lends itself to the old saying – just because you can do something, doesn’t mean you should do it.

Eating disorders, dissected

When we hear the term eating disorder, we automatically think of a shrinking young girl who has taken to starvation or eating a lot of food and then purging as a way to stay thin.  But there are other ways in which eating disorders manifest. We have grown quite accustomed to making foods that have some component of convenience to them – such as bottled dressings and sauces, packaged side dishes, pasteurized dairy products of all types (cheeses, milk, sauces, butter and “butter” products), bread and grain products, powdered foods that we add to water, soups, broths, juices, and canned fruits and vegetables. We use these items in our kitchen and mistakenly believe we are eating healthy because we are cooking something at home; but what we fail to realize is that we are not really eating healthier than if we were eating at a restaurant or some other place where we don’t know how the food is prepared or where it comes from.

When we eat substances like this, we are effectively eating the same as we would elsewhere because we are using unnatural, convenience foods of all types and harming our health. When you use packaged foods which have become such an integral part of our modern life, we are consuming substances of which we don’t know their origin nor understand how they are created.  And many of these same types of foods are the same found in restaurants which serve food that is not typically healthy. This is just one component of our collective eating disorder.

Then there are the foods which seem natural and whole, but have a complete constituency of substances in them that are virtually “hidden” to the naked eye which are toxic and harmful to consume – meats, dairy products, grains, and fruits and vegetables. In the average grocery store, these foods are wrought with chemicals, hormones, antibiotics, steroids, pesticides, and a number of other undesirable, health-issue-causing additives.

The food may appear acceptable by appearance, it probably even smells and tastes normal – the meat may look robust and red in the packaging, the fruits and vegetables may seem fresh and colorful – but in reality, these foods are laden with toxic chemicals and have been altered from their original state intended by nature due to the use of substances which make growing, manufacturing and production of these foods “easier” and “cheaper” for the food corporations that sell them. But at what cost to the consumer and the environment? Here we have found one more component of the complicated eating disorder surrounding diets in developed countries.

The human body needs nutrients, not synthetics

Although each person’s body is individualized and has its own physiology, basic tenets of nutrition apply to what everyone needs to be healthy. People need fat, protein, carbohydrates, and other nutrients like amino acids, enzymes, vitamins, and minerals. Many foods available in the modern age are typically less nutrient dense due to processing and toxin content, and because they are processed have a longer shelf life. In this instance, shelf life equals deterioration of food quality.

Do you know where it comes from?

Today, we purchase foods from the store that are shipped from all over the country and the world. We literally have no idea how long these foods have been sitting in the store nor where they come from, nor what has been done to them before they are delivered to the store.  Our purchasing and eating habits have so departed from how our ancestors did things, we go through our lives having no clue that much of what we are eating is toxic garbage. This should be disturbing to the average person, but we have become  conditioned to getting whatever we want whenever we want it, and having it taste just the right way (possible, of course, through the magic of taste engineering done in labs by scientists) – and we place that value far and beyond anything else when it comes to providing food for ourselves, that we don’t even stop to think about it.

Our focus has become centered upon how much fat and calories we consume, and less about the content of the foods we eat. So if we eat artificially-produced, processed foods, it really doesn’t matter how many calories or fat the food contains. Those nutrients (calories,proteins, carbohydrates, and fats) are empty and not nutritionally-dense. What’s more, those “foods” contain substances that are harmful to our health. Because they cannot be recognized by the human body as anything real, these synthetic substances become stored as fat in the cells and they also get absorbed into our bloodstream and affect our bodies in a negative way. Then they are able to cause damage in the form of free-radicals in the body.

How we are affected by our environment

As human beings, we desire to feel and look “right” according to the standards set forth by our expectations and culture. We are susceptible to the influence of many factors such as what  Mr. Jones down the road does or says, what the latest ad on television or a magazine tells us, and the rhetoric put forth by health and medical communities. We are totally unaware that most of what we are told to do by these parties is patently wrong and misleading. We spend money on fad diets, exercise regimens, health club memberships, advice, books, DVDs, treatments, and advice from so-called professionals or experts. Yet, we are some of the most unhealthy people on the planet and our obesity, heart disease, and cancer rates are rising each year.

People seldom stop to consider that all these compulsive things we do have a profoundly negative effect on health. We have been convinced and conditioned by media, experts, even our friends and family, that these are the right things to eat for our health. We don’t acknowledge that all of these things are completely unnatural and have undesirable consequences to our health – until we are forced by some serious illness or disease to do so. When we are diagnosed with something critical, we take it even one step further and go about treating it in the most unnatural way and the affects on our body can be devastating. We take dangerous drugs or have medical procedures that are costly. What we do to our bodies when they are compromised and sick can actually hinder the healing process completely and cause further complications or death.

The answer to our eating disorder

What can you do if you have an eating disorder? Remember, eating disorders can apply to those who are not in the extreme category as bulimia or anorexia. If you are eating real, whole foods containing fats, protein, and calories produced the way nature intended, your body recognizes these substances and the nutrients are real as well. Further, you don’t have to worry about “counting calories” and fat grams. Because the nutrients are real, your body can use them in a way that is helpful to the body, and is therefore life-giving. It has become unfashionable to eat real food, and now our stores and grocery centers are filled with a plethora of products to “make our lives better”, “healthier”, and more convenient. Because we have lost touch with where our food comes from and how it is grown and produced, we have in turn lost an important part of ourselves – our health.

The way to disable the eating disorder and get our health back is to start learning about where our food comes from and how the producers produce it. By making blind purchases at the grocery store and believing labels we read and advertisements we see or hear, we are falling victim to the marketing schemes of the modern world. We are allowing ourselves to consume food that is not really food. As a result, our health declines. And low and behold…we find ourselves right in the midst of an eating disorder without even realizing it. Good rules to follow are to read labels and don’t buy anything with more than five ingredients or containing something that you don’t recognize. When we return to real food, we return to health. Here’s how:

  1. Get to know local farmers, food growers, and merchants. Pay a visit to your local farm or farmer’s market.
  2. Do some research in your local area to find out where else you can purchase real food. Check the Internet, newspaper, and with people you know.
  3. Stop buying packaged, processed foods, or at the very least, reduce your buying of these items considerably.
  4. Look for natural, healthy foods at your local store such as grass-fed meats, organic fruits and vegetables, and whole grains in bulk.
  5. Educate yourself about how to prepare foods from scratch. There are a wealth of resources available on the web, at the library, and within your local community for free. Check out our recipes on this web site.
  6. Commit to yourself and your family to take time for these important activities. They may take extra time and a bit more effort, but the end result is better health and state of mind.
  7. If you find that making many changes all at once is overwhelming, select two or three things to change about your lifestyle, approach to eating, and overall health mentality, and build on those choices over time by adding a few more things each week or month as you are able. For some ideas about building your homekeeping skills, read: Embrace and Perfect Your Homekeeping Skills.
  8. Do look at organic, whole, traditional foods as your body’s friend. They are nutritious, wholesome, and deliver the right health benefits to your body. Avoid old thinking patterns about foods you may have been taught over your lifetime such as fats, cholesterol, and calories are unhealthy. The only fats, cholesterol, and calories that are unhealthy to consume are those that are artificially-produced. Read this article: The Importance of Dietary Fats. For more information about types of foods, read: How Well Do You Know Your Food? Find Out!
  9. Keep in mind that in general, the modern way of life is neither how our bodies were designed to be cared for nor the way we were intended to maintain our environments and look after nature. Do everything you can to scale back your lifestyle efforts so that you can defeat eating disorders, care for the earth, restore health, and return to a more natural way of existence.

This article is part of Food Renegade’s Fight Back Fridays Carnival. Please visit Food Renegade and read the other real food articles linked there.

Comments (2) »

Is Best Foods Mayonnaise Healthier than it Used to Be?

You may have seen recent television and magazine advertisements for Best Foods “real” olive oil mayonnaise, claiming its health benefits due to its Omega 3 content. Best Foods has started by changing the labeling on their mayonnaise to read “Real”, along with the assertion in their ads that their mayonnaise is made with “real” food. It sounds convincing, but when you look at the ingredients, you can immediately discern otherwise:

Water, oils (soybean oil, extra virgin olive oil), vinegar, whole eggs and egg yolks, modified corn starch, sugar, salt, lemon juice, (sorbic acid*, calcium disodium EDTA) used to protect quality, xantham gum*, citric acid*, natural flavors, oleoresin paprika, beta carotene* (color). Gluten free.

*Ingredient not in mayonnaise

There is a list of words in fine print at the bottom of the page found on their web site with this information which reads the following:

*Contains 650mg ALA per serving which is 50% Daily Value for Omega 3 ALA (1300mg).

For anyone acquainted with natural sources, it is pretty obvious that none of the ingredients listed have anything containing Omega 3 essential fatty acids. Soybean oil is a processed, rancid oil that is extremely high in Omega 6 content.  Too many Omega 6s in the diet cause inflammation, which contributes to degenerative disease.

Olive oil is a healthy oil only if it is high quality (Best Foods uses Bertolli) and is contained properly (in a dark bottle). Olive oil can go rancid easily, and sitting in a jar of mayonnaise with a clear glass container is a good place for that to occur. Olive oil is not an Omega 3 essential fatty acid, it is actually an Omega 9.

Here is the ingredient list for Best Foods standard mayonnaise:

Soybean oil, whole eggs, vinegar, water, egg yolks, salt, sugar, lemon juice, natural flavors, calcium disodium EDTA (used to protect quality)

Of course, Best Foods are still touting the usual trendy statement to which many food companies lay claim, which is that their products contain “no trans fats”. Au contrare, but they do! Like many other commercial mayonnaises, this brand contains soybean oil, which is always rancid by the time it gets to your sandwich or salad (a trans fat by any other name).

They even put butter and lard in the same category as partially-hydrogenated oils. Shame on them for misleading the consumer!

The ingredient calcium disodium EDTA is a neurotoxin and is dangerous to consume. Read about this here.

According to Hellman’s and Best Foods:

What is real mayonnaise?
Mayonnaise, as defined by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Standard of Identity, must contain at least 65% oil by weight, vinegar, and egg or egg yolks. It may contain spices and natural seasonings except turmeric and saffron, whose yellow color might suggest added egg yolk. Preservatives such as calcium disodium EDTA are acceptable and approved for use in mayonnaise.

On another topic of relevance, we know that many store-bought products contain ingredients with GMOs (genetically-modifed organisms). Mayonnaise is no exception. Here is an interesting blog post I found from a person who contacted Best Foods/Unilever Foods asking about the presence of GMO’s in their mayonnaise, and here is their response:

Thanks for writing!

It is our policy that any of our products which may contain ingredients created through the use of biotechnology, be proven that their safety to consumers and the environment is fully established.

Biotechnology has the potential to help meet the demands of people for everyday products that are more environmentally friendly; that involve less processing; that are more functional; that taste better; that last longer; that provide added nutritional benefits; that are customized to an individual’s lifestyle; and that are currently available. Biotechnology is important to Unilever (Lipton etc,) because it helps our mission as one of the world’s largest consumer goods companies to continue to deliver innovative products that our consumers tell us they want. Products resulting from biotechnology have been used successfully and safely for many years – for example: in the pharmaceutical industry.

We are also committed to the provision of the best possible information to the consumer. The FDA has had a sound labeling system in place for biotech foods since 1992. Under that system, biotech foods must be labeled if they are found to be significantly different from their conventional counterparts, or if they contain allergens. This is the same basic program that safeguards the conventional food supply in the United States.

Since there is no difference between plants or foods derived from biotechnology and those not derived, there is no clear reason to label either respectively. All of our products are labeled in accordance with the rules and regulations of the federal government.

It is our responsibility at Unilever – and a responsibility we take very seriously – to make certain all of our ingredients are safe. We believe biotechnology is already significant and that its development will continue to bring major benefits to society as a whole.

Thank you for your interest,

Your friends at Unilever Foods

Basically, what I believe the company is telling the consumer in this letter is that you should not worry about anything created synthetically, and that any of those items are just as safe to consume as anything grown in nature. I’m also hearing that because the government has set forth laws and regulations, and Best Foods adheres to those standards, we should just blindly trust their judgment about what is healthy to consume (we know they’ve been wrong before!). It is unbelievable that companies are allowed to sell foods like this, present untruthful information, and then use government laws and regulations to back up their claims.

To recap what we’ve discussed here:

  1. Best Foods Mayonnaise does not contain Omega 3 essential fatty acids. It does in fact, contain Omega 6s (from rancid soybean oil) and Omega 9s from olive oil of which we don’t know a great lot of detail about its source. We already mentioned that too many Omega 6s lead to disease. Too many Omega 6s are common in the Western diet (particularly in the United States).
  2. This brand includes additives in their product such as calcium disodium EDTA and “natural flavors” (for preservative and taste qualities) that have been shown to cause health issues. For more reading on these subjects, check out Hard to Swallow: The Truth About Food Additives by Karen Evans and Doris Sarjent and Excitoxins: The Taste that Kills By Dr. Russell Blaylock, M.D.
  3. Best Foods also admits to using GMOs in their ingredients, and claims these substances are not harmful to human health (soybean oil is usually from a GMO source unless otherwise labeled, and Best Foods claims in their letter above not only to use GMOs but also believes they are safe to consume). To learn more about the dangers of GMOs, visit the Safe Food web site.
  4. Finally, the other ingredients used in their mayonnaise are most likely from factory farm and industrial sources – eggs, vinegar, lemon juice, sugar, and water. Industrial eggs are wrought with chemicals, hormones, antibiotics, and contain low levels of nutrients – especially the all-important Omega 3s and conjugated linoleic acid.

There may be some question as to whether or not other brands are as nutritionally-deficient as Best Foods, and the answer is most definitely, yes. Just read the labels to find out; become a health sleuth. Many brands will claim that vegetable oils such as canola oil are “heart healthy”. Canola oil is another high content Omega 6, usually genetically-modified, and rancid on the shelf. This oil is commonly found in many brands of mayonnaise. Most brands on the market will have either canola, soybean, sunflower, safflower, or cottonseed oil in them – all are unhealthy vegetable oils that are not organic, unless labeled, are rancid, and genetically-modified.

Alternatives? Make your own mayonnaise. Here are some good recipes:

Dr. Ben Kim

Cheeseslave

Kelly The Kitchen Kop

Passionate Homemaking – coconut oil mayonnaise!

This post is listed on Kelly The Kitchen Kop’s Real Food Wednesdays Carnival. Check out the other great real food posts there.

Comments (10) »

Steak Enchiladas with Homemade Red Sauce

It’s no secret that I love Mexican food, and I’m always excited about preparing traditional dishes with whole foods and real ingredients because most restaurants don’t use them. In this recipe, you get all of the amazing flavor of your favorite enchiladas from the restaurant, without any of the unhealthy attributes of restaurant food.

You can use any type of meat filling you want; you could even use just cheese. But I love the combination of dramatic tastes and seasonings in this meal when using steak and cheese together with the red sauce. The taste of of this recipe is positively explosive in southwestern flavor.

Ingredients:

  • 1 pound of grass fed steak, your favorite cut (we used a sirloin)
  • Approximately 1/4 pound of grated cheese (we used Organic Valley Raw Monterey Jack) – use more if you prefer your enchiladas cheesier
  • Organic, sprouted corn tortillas (we used Ezekiel organic sprouted corn tortillas)
  • Diced onions (we used half of a large onion, you can use more or less)
  • 2 – 3 tablespoons of olive oil
  • Salt and pepper

Directions:

  1. Saute onions with steak in a pan with the olive oil, salt, and pepper. Alternatively, you can grill your steak on a barbecue or in the oven for approximately 15 – 20 minutes, depending on the thickness of the steak. You will want to cook steak until just over the rare side.
  2. While steak is cooking, start enchilada sauce (see ingredients and directions below).
  3. Warm tortillas for 1 to 2 minutes on a baking sheet in the oven (lowest temperature setting). If tortillas are frozen, heat longer (3 to 4 minutes). When you are finished warming the tortillas, raise oven temperature to 350 degrees.
  4. Grate cheese in a bowl and set aside.
  5. Take the steak out of the pan and cut up into bite-sized pieces.
  6. Take tortillas out of oven and fill with pieces of steak, cheese, and a teaspoon or two of the red sauce.
  7. Place your tortillas in a baking dish (we used a 9×5 inch baking dish). Wrap your tortillas with filling and press together inside baking dish.
  8. After you have filled the baking dish with tortillas and filling, pour the remainder of sauce over the enchiladas. Sprinkle enchiladas with cheese.
  9. Place the baking dish in the oven and cook for approximately 25 minutes.
  10. Take enchiladas out of the oven, cool for five minutes, and serve. Serves 3 – 4 people.

Ingredients for red sauce:

  • 1 tablespoon olive oil
  • 2 cloves garlic, minced
  • 1 teaspoon minced onion
  • 1/2 teaspoon dried oregano
  • 2 1/2 teaspoons chili powder
  • 1/2 teaspoon dried basil
  • 1/8 teaspoon ground black pepper
  • 1/8 teaspoon salt
  • 1/4 teaspoon ground cumin
  • 1 teaspoon dried parsley
  • 1/4 cup salsa
  • 1 (6 ounce) can tomato organic sauce
  • 1 1/2 cups water

Directions:

  1. In a medium-sized pan, heat the oil on medium heat. Add garlic and saute for 1 to 2 minutes. Add the onion, oregano, chili powder, basil, ground black pepper, salt, cumin, parsley, salsa and tomato sauce.
  2. Mix together and then stir in the water. Bring to a boil, reduce heat to low and simmer for 15 to 20 minutes.

Comments (3) »

Is the Threat of Codex Alimentarius Real or a Hoax?

www.mypicshares.com

Are you interested in protecting the future of your health freedoms and ability to obtain healthy food for your family? Frequently in the news we hear reports about the NAIS (National Animal Identification System), genetically-modified organisms, and many other food-related issues. Do not doubt it: the future of our ability to procure real, healthy food is definitely at stake.

There is another threat which may yet overshadow all of these other activities. The organization known as Codex Alimentarius (parented by the World Health Organization) was created in 1963 and was intended to be a Trade Commission by the United Nations to monitor and control the trade of  food on an international scale. Yet there have been outcries from individuals, groups, and organizations about the authority given by Codex to regulate the manufacturing, production, and sale of food and food products around the globe. Are these inquisitions valid, or just conspiracy theory – or is there something even bigger at work?

What is the organization’s purpose?

Although originally its intent was to provide regulatory safety standards of the sale and production of  food, ensure fair trade practices, and defend the rights of consumer health,  it has gradually been overtaken by big corporate and political interests.

This  organization favors agribusiness and big business giants such as pharmaceutical, biotechology, chemical, industrial, and pesticide companies. All of these corporations sell toxic products which also happen to be the most heavily-subsidized commodities in the world, and are protected by massive lobbyist activity in the political realm.

It appears that one of the main purposes of Codex is to impose limitations on the distribution of nutrients to consumers in food and supplements.  In 1994, a man by the name of Dr. Rolf Grossklaus designated nutrients as toxic. The way to assess nutrients was accomplished via toxicology (Risk Assessment, as opposed to using scientific inquiry and biochemistry) to prevent over-exposure to nutrients by humans taking dietary supplements.

According to Natural News:

“In the US, consumers and natural healthcare practitioners make heavy use of supplements to prevent, treat and cure the chronic diseases of under-nutrition. Chronic degenerative diseases (i.e., cancer, diabetes, arthritis, heart disease and stroke, etc.) are well known to develop from nutrient restrictions or shortages like those imposed by the ultra low nutrient levels resulting from Risk Assessment techniques. These degenerative diseases can often be prevented, and well treated by, nutritional medicine. Nutritional preventive and clinical strategies will be illegal under both the EFSD (European Food Supplement Directive, described as “the future face of CODEX”) and the toxicology-based CODEX Vitamin and Mineral Guideline.”

The implementation of Codex regulatory laws could also, at the very least, impose limitations upon the manufacturing and purchase of vitamin, mineral, and dietary supplements. If Codex regulatory standards are put into place, our basic freedom to choose as treatment and prevention for our health will be in jeopardy – supplementation, traditional remedies, clean food (such as organic and naturally-grown or raised food), and natural treatment.

It is in the interests of big corporations like pharmaceutical companies and industrial food producers to make virtually all of our natural health choices illegal because it poses a threat to their livelihood – the manufacturing and selling of products which are in direct opposition to natural foods, dietary supplements, and treatments. The bottom line is, the more people begin to turn to natural supplementation and real food for their health, the less profit industrial food companies and the pharmaceutical industry will make.

Who else is behind the curtain?

Although Codex has issued  various forms of documentation detailing how foods and additives are to be regulated, the organization responsible for imposing these regulations is the European Directive. The following is an excerpt from The Alliance for Natural Health web site:

“In many ways, it is more correct to see Codex (with respect to its limited application to natural health issues) as the primary mechanism that allows restrictive European laws to be exported into Codex.  From there it then forms an international guideline for the rest of the world.  It’s important then to appreciate that these guidelines cannot directly limit the availability of products—it’s only when they are then implemented into national or regional laws that restrictions occur.

Codex member countries, of which there are over 170, are strongly encouraged to adopt Codex guidelines and standards, not just on natural health issues but across all other parts of the food chain, into their national or regional laws.  And to understand more about the consequences of not implementing Codex guidelines and standards, please see both the ANH’s Codex campaign and its Say No to GM campaign.  Here you’ll find examples of how the World Trade Organization imposes trade sanctions, that have the capacity to cripple any country other than a super power.”

So, it is the European Food Safety Authority and European Directive which has the real ability and power to use mechanisms like Codex to enforce authority over how we purchase and consume food.

Codex documentation

As a testament to the purpose of Codex, this organization has an entire published document devoted to the subject of food additives, their uses, acceptable daily intake, and maximum usage level. The document details the “justification” for the usage of food additives and acceptable maximum levels of food additives. Finally the document compiles an exhaustive list of any type of food available on the market including all chemicals and additives in those foods and the maximum levels allowed for each.

Codex also has various other documents (available online), including one devoted to the subject of organically-produced foods. This document includes information about definitions of organically-produced foods and the standards by which these foods are produced and sold.  If it seems disconcerting that a powerful organization such as this has produced a document about organic foods and how they are to be produced and sold, there is a reason.  The efforts of this organization are primarily supported by big agricultural and pharmaceutical interests, and therefore should automatically be suspect in its intent toward the quality and future of real, organically-produced food.

Other relevant subjects for which Codex has produced literature is Foods Derived from Modern Biotechnology. This document discloses standards and regulations by which manufacturers and producers are allowed to sell foods created through genetically-modified activities, foods derived  from recumbinant-DNA plants and the application of “risk assessment” to determine the presence of hazards or nutritional safety risk. This “risk assessment” is the same tool Codex uses to determine the “toxicity” of nutrients found in foods.

DSHEA and what it does to protect consumers

The Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 – the dietary supplement manufacturer is responsible for ensuring that a dietary supplement is safe before going on the market. The FDA is responsible to take action against any company which produces unsafe dietary supplement products after it reaches the market. Currently, manufacturers are not required to register products with FDA nor gain FDA approval before producing or selling dietary supplements.

The DSHEA can only protect consumers from laws generated by Codex that affect their ability to obtain dietary supplements as long as the government does not pass legislation that would nullify its power. There are a growing number of threats to the DSHEA which have the potential to affect its protection over consumer freedoms to use dietary supplements.  To date, the most serious of these threats lie within the Codex document Guidelines for Vitamin and Mineral Food Supplements, which require mandatory compliance by corporations and merchants selling these types of products.

The image portrayed on the Codex web site about its efforts is that its main purpose is to “protect consumers”. But it is also important to remember that while the organization has devoted much time and effort attempting to guard the consumer against danger, its main support comes from multi-billion dollar corporations and entities – all in existence to accomplish one goal – make a profit.

It is important to note that many alarmist web sites and information exist on the Internet and otherwise, making claims about Codex Alimentarius that present some information that is false and misleading.  Learn the facts.

Two good sources of information to help the consumer separate fact from fiction about Codex can be found on:

The Organic Consumer’s Organization web site

The Alliance for Natural Health

Whether you believe Codex Alimentarius to be a friend or foe, staying informed and educated about the activities of such organizations will prove crucial for the future of our food.

Interested in learning more and getting involved?  We want to limit the European Directive’s ability to use Codex and other mechanisms to:

  • Affect our freedoms to purchase quality food and dietary supplements and
  • Allow toxic chemicals, additives, and non-food substances into the food we consume

Visit the The Alliance for Natural Health, learn about the petition you can sign, and make your voice heard now!

This post is linked to on Food Renegade’s Fight Back Fridays Carnival. Please visit this site and read the other great real food articles listed there.


Comments (1) »

ACTION NOW! USDA Ready to Approve Widespread, Risky Field Trial of GE Trees

This e-mail arrived in my inbox this week, and it is an urgent call to action regarding genetically-engineered organisms. For those of you who are not familiar with the dangers of using genetically-modified organisms, here is a short list (source, Safe-Food.org):

  • Imprecise Technology—A genetic engineer moves genes from one organism to another. A gene can be cut precisely from the DNA of an organism, but the insertion into the DNA of the target organism is basically random. As a consequence, there is a risk that it may disrupt the functioning of other genes essential to the life of that organism. (Bergelson 1998)
  • Side Effects—Genetic engineering is like performing heart surgery with a shovel. Scientists do not yet understand living systems completely enough to perform DNA surgery without creating mutations which could be harmful to the environment and our health. They are experimenting with very delicate, yet powerful forces of nature, without full knowledge of the repercussions. (Washington Times 1997, The Village Voice 1998)
  • Widespread Crop Failure—Genetic engineers intend to profit by patenting genetically engineered seeds. This means that, when a farmer plants genetically engineered seeds, all the seeds have identical genetic structure. As a result, if a fungus, a virus, or a pest develops which can attack this particular crop, there could be widespread crop failure. (Robinson 1996)
  • Threatens Our Entire Food Supply—Insects, birds, and wind can carry genetically altered seeds into neighboring fields and beyond. Pollen from transgenic plants can cross-pollinate with genetically natural crops and wild relatives. All crops, organic and non-organic, are vulnerable to contamination from cross-pollinatation. (Emberlin et al 1999)

For more information, see link referenced above.

It is our duty as informed citizens to become educated about the issues of genetically-engineered crops and vehemently oppose them. Please read the following message from Center for Food Safety and take action today!

Deadline for this item is July 7, 2009. When you click on “take action” or “Tell a Friend”, please be sure to insert your own information in the boxes before submitting. Thanks for your support!




USDA Poised to Approve Widespread, Risky Field Trial of GE Trees

Dear Raine,

The biotechnology firm ArborGen has asked the USDA for
permission to conduct 29 field trials of genetically engineered
“cold tolerant” eucalyptus trees in the U.S.
For the first
time in history, this massive experiment, which is on the verge
of being green-lighted, will literally be using nature as the
laboratory to test more than 260,000 genetically engineered
trees. Scientists across the U.S. are voicing concerns over this
proposal.

As it did with GE alfalfa, USDA failed to conduct and
prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to
comprehensively address all the relevant issues related to the
proposed eucalyptus field trials.
Scientists at Duke
University in North Carolina have created pollen models that
show tree pollen traveling from a forest in North Carolina for
over 1,000 kilometers northward into eastern Canada. A study
published in the New Physiologist found pine pollen 600
kilometers from the nearest pines. Scientists researching
sterility in trees have admitted that 100 percent guaranteed
sterility in GE trees is impossible. This evidence implies that
if GE trees are released into the environment, widespread and
irreversible contamination of native forests cannot be
prevented.

Contamination of natural trees by GE eucalyptus could pose
a severe environmental threat.
Eucalyptus grow well in warm
climates, so engineering them to tolerate cold temperatures
removes the only barrier to their unrestricted spread. In some
places where eucalyptus have been introduced, they are well
known for escaping and colonizing native ecosystems. For
example, eucalyptus is listed as an invasive species and a
costly plant pest in California. The spread of these plants into
the wild through seeds and plant matter is highly likely, and
the impacts on native ecosystems from this invader are largely
unknown. Additionally, one of the experimental GE tree varieties
is a known host for cryptococcus gatti, a fatal fungal pathogen
whose spores cause meningitis in people and animals.

Despite recent federal court decisions that USDA failed to
address the risk of contamination and other environmental risks
from genetically engineered plants, like GE bentgrass and
alfalfa, USDA seems poised to push ahead with this dangerous
proposal.

A public comment period is open until July 6th, 2009
- please send your comment to USDA APHIS opposing this risky
proposal today!

Send a letter to the following decision maker(s):

Docket No. APHIS-2008-0059

Below is the sample letter:

Subject: Oppose Docket No. APHIS-2008-0059

Dear [decision maker name automatically inserted here],

Docket No. APHIS-2008-0059
Regulatory Analysis and Development
PPD, APHIS, Station 3A-03.8
4700 River Road, Unit 118
Riverdale, MD 20737-1238

Re: USDA/ APHIS Docket No. APHIS-2008-0059

I am strongly opposed to ArborGen’s proposal to conduct 29 field trials of experimental genetically engineered eucalyptus trees in the U.S. (APHIS-2008-0059) for the following reasons:

As it did with GE alfalfa, USDA failed to conduct and prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to comprehensively address all the relevant issues related to the proposed eucalyptus field trials.

Eucalyptus species are introduced organisms into the US and grow well in certain warm climates such as the southern and southeast US regions. The main barrier to Eucalyptus becoming established in this region is that the varieties planted often die in cold temperatures. Genetically engineering them to tolerate those cold temperatures removes that barrier. In other regions, where eucalyptus have been introduced, they are well known for escaping and colonizing native ecosystems. Eucalyptus has become so established in California that it is now listed as an invasive species and a plant pest in the state.

Scientists at Duke University in North Carolina have created pollen models that show tree pollen traveling from a forest in North Carolina for over 1,000 kil
ometers northward into eastern Canada. A study published in the New Physiologist found pine pollen 600 kilometers from the nearest pines. Scientists researching sterility in trees have admitted that 100 percent guaranteed sterility in GE trees is impossible. This evidence implies that if GE trees are released into the environment, widespread and irreversible contamination of native forests cannot be prevented.

Contamination of natural trees by GE eucalyptus could pose a severe environmental threat. The spread of these plants into the wild through seeds and plant matter is highly likely, and the impacts on native ecosystems from this invader are largely unknown. Additionally, one of the experimental GE tree varieties is a known host for cryptococcus gatti, a fatal fungal pathogen whose spores cause meningitis in people and animals.

By the agency’s own admission, there are several varieties of eucalyptus that are naturally cold-tolerant, at least eight of which
could be grown in Southern U.S. states like Alabama. This field trial is not only risky, it is completely unnecessary.

Please deny this request, and require the implementation of a full Environmental Impact Statement.

Sincerely,

Your name

Take Action!
Instructions:


Click here to take action on this issue or choose the “Reply to Sender” option on your email program.

Tell-A-Friend:


Visit the web address below to tell your friends about this.

Tell-a-Friend!

What’s At Stake:

For more information on genetically trees, links to reports, and more, visit the Stop GE Trees Coalition website, a project of the Global Justice Ecology Project

Campaign Expiration Date:


July 7, 2009



Leave a comment »